Timeline for Were Bourbaki committed to set-theoretical reductionism?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Aug 21, 2018 at 17:50 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed dead link
|
| Aug 21, 2018 at 17:12 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 21, 2018 at 17:50 | |||||
| Jan 7, 2018 at 12:29 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Yes, that is right. And no set at all of cardinality $\aleph_\omega$. | |
| Jan 7, 2018 at 2:28 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | To clarify, isn't it the case that the von Neumann ordinal ω+ω can't be proved to exist in ZC, but other ordered sets with that order type can? For instance the disjoint union of two copies of N, specifying everything in the second copy is greater than everything in the first. | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| May 25, 2010 at 17:00 | history | edited | Dmitri Pavlov | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Feb 23, 2010 at 16:33 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Feb 23, 2010 at 16:29 | history | answered | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 2.5 |