Timeline for Doubt in this proof of Horrocks theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2014 at 0:57 | vote | accept | user26832 | ||
| Mar 28, 2014 at 22:35 | comment | added | user26832 | Why downvoted?? | |
| Mar 28, 2014 at 22:23 | answer | added | Mohan | timeline score: 2 | |
| S Mar 28, 2014 at 15:15 | history | suggested | Mahdi Majidi-Zolbanin |
Added a Tag.
|
|
| Mar 28, 2014 at 15:11 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 28, 2014 at 15:15 | |||||
| Mar 27, 2014 at 23:15 | comment | added | user26832 | @darijgrinberg Thank you for the reference. However, it's another kind of proof. I'm still curious why this part is true in Lang's book. I think this part is more complicated than I thought. | |
| Mar 27, 2014 at 22:58 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Proposition V.2.6 in T. Y. Lam's "Serre's problem on projective modules" is a generalization of the theorem. See also his Proposition III.2.6. | |
| Mar 27, 2014 at 22:44 | comment | added | user26832 | @darijgrinberg yes, I've already searched in another books, I couldn't find any other books/articles with the same proof, do you know some references? | |
| Mar 27, 2014 at 22:41 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Repost of math.stackexchange.com/questions/729081/… . As I said in another of your threads, the proof is from Serge Lang's "Algebra", and you might like to try a different book instead, since Lang's proofs often lack detail and precision (I don't understand this one either). | |
| Mar 27, 2014 at 20:38 | history | asked | user26832 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |