Timeline for A couple of facts on the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann Zeta function
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2014 at 15:35 | vote | accept | barak manos | ||
| Mar 26, 2014 at 15:35 | comment | added | barak manos | OK, thank you very much for your answer. | |
| Mar 26, 2014 at 14:44 | comment | added | Denis Chaperon de Lauzières | For the first, no, as far as I know there could be a zero with real part given by any rational number between 1/2 and 1; for the second, also no, there is no explicit vertical line without zeros that is currently known (again, to my knowledge). | |
| Mar 26, 2014 at 13:03 | comment | added | barak manos | Thank you. Doesn't that mean that there is a finite number of vertical lines with zeros (since the number of real values between 0 and 1 is "equally" uncountable)? Also, is there at least one specific line without any zeros whose Real value is known? | |
| Mar 26, 2014 at 12:17 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Mar 26, 2014 at 12:27 | |||||
| Mar 26, 2014 at 12:02 | history | answered | Denis Chaperon de Lauzières | CC BY-SA 3.0 |