edited title

Link

edited Jul 17, 2020 at 10:48

Harry Gindi

19.6k
16
123
215

Formally étale at all primes does not imply formally étale.?

18

occurred Mar 11, 2010 at 19:50

Bounty Ended with Bjorn Poonen's answer chosen by Harry Gindi

occurred Mar 4, 2010 at 7:22

edited title

Link

edited Mar 2, 2010 at 21:50

Kim Morrison

7.8k
7
48
75

Formally étale at all primes does not imply formally étale. (Downvotes are because I changed the title to a joke title earlier)

edited title

Link

edited Feb 26, 2010 at 2:55

Harry Gindi

19.6k
16
123
215

Formally étale at all primes does not imply formally étale. (By popular demandDownvotes are because I changed the title to a joke title earlier).

deleted 279 characters in body; edited title

Source Link

edited Feb 26, 2010 at 1:45

Harry Gindi

19.6k
16
123
215

Loading

deleted 149 characters in body; edited title

Source Link

edited Feb 26, 2010 at 0:52

Harry Gindi

19.6k
16
123
215

Loading

added 40 characters in body

Source Link

edited Feb 25, 2010 at 7:53

Harry Gindi

19.6k
16
123
215

Loading

Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Harry Gindi

occurred Feb 25, 2010 at 6:17

added 94 characters in body; added 11 characters in body; Post Made Community Wiki

Source Link

edited Feb 24, 2010 at 22:07

Harry Gindi

19.6k
16
123
215

Loading

added 2 characters in body

Source Link

edited Feb 24, 2010 at 4:46

Harry Gindi

19.6k
16
123
215

Loading

added 2 characters in body

Source Link

edited Feb 23, 2010 at 17:28

Harry Gindi

19.6k
16
123
215

Loading

added 94 characters in body

Source Link

edited Feb 23, 2010 at 11:52

Harry Gindi

19.6k
16
123
215

Loading

added 238 characters in body; edited tags; edited title; added 62 characters in body; added 7 characters in body

Source Link

edited Feb 23, 2010 at 8:41

Harry Gindi

19.6k
16
123
215

Loading

better wording; edited title

Source Link

edited Feb 23, 2010 at 7:49

Harry Gindi

19.6k
16
123
215

Loading

clarification

Source Link

edited Feb 23, 2010 at 7:13

Harry Gindi

19.6k
16
123
215

Loading

Source Link

asked Feb 23, 2010 at 6:04

Harry Gindi

19.6k
16
123
215

Loading

Stack Exchange Network

Return to Question

Formally étale at all primes does not imply formally étale.?

Formally étale at all primes does not imply formally étale. (Downvotes are because I changed the title to a joke title earlier)

Formally étale at all primes does not imply formally étale. (By popular demandDownvotes are because I changed the title to a joke title earlier).