Timeline for An affine invariant of convex bodies
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2014 at 10:25 | history | edited | alvarezpaiva | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Mar 19, 2014 at 10:19 | history | edited | alvarezpaiva | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2225 characters in body
|
| Mar 18, 2014 at 17:25 | comment | added | Joseph O'Rourke | Yes, I see your reasoning; you are likely correct. | |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 17:12 | history | edited | alvarezpaiva | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 193 characters in body
|
| Mar 18, 2014 at 16:53 | comment | added | alvarezpaiva | @JosephO'Rourke: I don't think so. They are pointed, but they have more symmetries and thus the set of transformations that leave them "almost" invariant would seem to be larger. | |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 16:38 | comment | added | Joseph O'Rourke | Perhaps cubes and octahedra minimize, rather than simplices, as they are in some sense the "pointiest" convex bodies...? | |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 16:14 | history | asked | alvarezpaiva | CC BY-SA 3.0 |