Timeline for The most unexpected and/or the least natural category theory theorem?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2014 at 17:11 | answer | added | Zhen Lin | timeline score: 7 | |
| Mar 19, 2014 at 16:52 | answer | added | Todd Trimble | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 19, 2014 at 13:13 | answer | added | Tom De Medts | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 23:32 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 17, 2014 at 8:59 | |||||
| Mar 16, 2014 at 22:10 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| Mar 16, 2014 at 21:29 | history | edited | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo
|
| Mar 16, 2014 at 17:04 | comment | added | Wlodek Kuperberg | "Unexpected/least natural" is not the same as "applied", unless such applications per se are unexpected. | |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 16:39 | comment | added | Allen Knutson | So we don't have to show that the least natural theorem exists uniquely up to isomorphism? | |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 13:33 | comment | added | Paul Siegel | What I learned from the answers to that question is that theorems in category theory are often simple and not very surprising, but when you apply them to specific cleverly chosen categories you can get surprising and beautiful constructions almost for free. | |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 13:29 | comment | added | Paul Siegel | One of my old questions may be relevant: mathoverflow.net/questions/83437/… | |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 11:02 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | Duplicate? mathoverflow.net/questions/19325/… | |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 8:47 | history | edited | Włodzimierz Holsztyński |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 16, 2014 at 8:41 | history | asked | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | CC BY-SA 3.0 |