Timeline for How is the deconvolution of a fat gaussian from a polynomial derived?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2016 at 0:17 | vote | accept | Christian Chapman | ||
| May 13, 2016 at 0:17 | answer | added | Christian Chapman | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 23, 2014 at 23:15 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | Instead of closing, could you just write a short answer? | |
| Aug 23, 2014 at 20:36 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 23, 2014 at 23:15 | |||||
| Aug 23, 2014 at 20:20 | comment | added | Christian Chapman | With reference to the flag, of course it is a polynomial; there are deltas. Had I been exposed to the theory of distributions before attempting this it would have been textbook. | |
| Mar 13, 2014 at 18:49 | comment | added | Christian Chapman | Oops. Maple says the result is a polynomial of $x$ and $y$, and what I posted is that polynomial's evaluation at $0$. (i.e. the result of integrating the quotient of Fourier transforms over the entire plane) | |
| Mar 13, 2014 at 18:04 | history | edited | Christian Chapman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 123 characters in body
|
| Mar 13, 2014 at 4:19 | history | edited | Christian Chapman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Mar 13, 2014 at 4:05 | history | edited | Christian Chapman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 215 characters in body; edited title
|
| Mar 13, 2014 at 1:44 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 13, 2014 at 4:03 | |||||
| Mar 13, 2014 at 1:36 | history | edited | Christian Chapman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Mar 13, 2014 at 1:31 | history | edited | Christian Chapman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Mar 13, 2014 at 1:26 | history | asked | Christian Chapman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |