Timeline for matroids axioms and independence system
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2014 at 0:01 | comment | added | Russ Woodroofe | @user47659: Yes, that's what I mean. It's easiest to prove if you focus on the (minimal) non-faces of $\Delta$ and the circuits of matroids, rather than the faces and independent sets. Here face == independent set, in different terminology. | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 19:59 | comment | added | NotNow | By containing $\Delta$ as a subcomplex, do you mean that every independent set of $\Delta$ is also an independent set of the matroid? | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 1:20 | history | answered | Russ Woodroofe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |