Timeline for The Book for ergodic theory on SFT in dimension $D>1.$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2014 at 17:07 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | I think the issue is that too much goes wrong and it's hard to build a general theory of 2D SFTs. This started with the undecidability results, and continued with a whole range of things that fail in 2D, but which are satisfied in 1D. There's a danger that a book would turn into a catalogue of examples. To some extent, though, the situation has been rescued by the relatively recent Hochman & Meyerovitch paper | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 16:45 | comment | added | user39115 | Why do you think people in general are not interested? Just because it is too difficult? | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 14:24 | history | edited | Anthony Quas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
| Mar 11, 2014 at 13:56 | vote | accept | user39115 | ||
| Mar 10, 2014 at 22:13 | history | answered | Anthony Quas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |