Timeline for The Book for ergodic theory on SFT in dimension $D>1.$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2014 at 9:16 | answer | added | Nishant Chandgotia | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 19:16 | comment | added | Algernon | They are! But I would never know the difficulties if I don't try the one-dimensional arguments first. | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 16:49 | comment | added | user39115 | $D>1$ is a serious business...Things are pretty much difficult that just doing this... | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 13:56 | vote | accept | user39115 | ||
| Mar 11, 2014 at 8:37 | comment | added | Algernon | As for being motivated too much by physics phenomena, I am afraid you may have to get used to it. Physics is the main motivation for doing ergodic theory. (I know some people are going to get mad at me here, but I tell the truth nevertheless ;-) ) | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 8:31 | comment | added | Algernon | Pick a standard ergodic theory book (like Walter's) and try to extend the results to higher dimensions on your own. Once having trouble, consult Keller's book (or survey/research papers). You will find that Keller's book is pretty descent and pedagogically conscious. | |
| Mar 10, 2014 at 22:13 | answer | added | Anthony Quas | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 10, 2014 at 21:09 | history | undeleted | user39115 | ||
| Mar 10, 2014 at 10:07 | history | deleted | user39115 | via Vote | |
| Mar 10, 2014 at 9:56 | history | asked | user39115 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |