Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

What is the easiest (and what is the most elementary) way of proving Newlander-Nirenberg theorem for Riemannian surfaces? I was able to reduce it to existence of non-trivial harmonic functions (locally) on 2-dimensional Riemannian manifolds, but this seems to be non-trivial, too. I want to have a construction using 1-dimensional complex analysis and not much else.

A similar question was asked herehere.

What is the easiest (and what is the most elementary) way of proving Newlander-Nirenberg theorem for Riemannian surfaces? I was able to reduce it to existence of non-trivial harmonic functions (locally) on 2-dimensional Riemannian manifolds, but this seems to be non-trivial, too. I want to have a construction using 1-dimensional complex analysis and not much else.

A similar question was asked here.

What is the easiest (and what is the most elementary) way of proving Newlander-Nirenberg theorem for Riemannian surfaces? I was able to reduce it to existence of non-trivial harmonic functions (locally) on 2-dimensional Riemannian manifolds, but this seems to be non-trivial, too. I want to have a construction using 1-dimensional complex analysis and not much else.

A similar question was asked here.

Source Link
Misha Verbitsky
  • 9.2k
  • 1
  • 28
  • 48

Newlander-Nirenberg in dimension 2

What is the easiest (and what is the most elementary) way of proving Newlander-Nirenberg theorem for Riemannian surfaces? I was able to reduce it to existence of non-trivial harmonic functions (locally) on 2-dimensional Riemannian manifolds, but this seems to be non-trivial, too. I want to have a construction using 1-dimensional complex analysis and not much else.

A similar question was asked here.