Timeline for How difficult is Morse theory on stacks?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2018 at 0:26 | history | edited | David Roberts♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Expanded tags, fixed small TeX bug
|
| Jul 11, 2010 at 2:40 | vote | accept | Theo Johnson-Freyd | ||
| May 8, 2010 at 18:36 | answer | added | André Henriques | timeline score: 10 | |
| Apr 12, 2010 at 9:15 | comment | added | Jeffrey Giansiracusa | You might also want to look at Hepworth's other paper, arXiv:0712.2432 'Morse Inequalities for Orbifold Cohomology' though I think it doesn't quite answer the question that you've posed. | |
| Apr 6, 2010 at 21:27 | comment | added | Zoran Skoda | Similar motivation is in Hepworth | |
| Feb 21, 2010 at 2:37 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | @Charles: That's a good suggestion. This isn't my area, and more generally I don't really care about the actual "Morse Theory" of stacks. All I really care about is the local question of whether I can make my critical point nondegenerate. But, yes, the literature very well might answer it. | |
| Feb 21, 2010 at 2:13 | comment | added | Charles Rezk | There is a literature on "equivariant Morse theory" (of which my ignorance is nearly total). Have you looked into this? In particular, your question seems to specialize to a pretty natural-looking question about a G-invariant morse function on a manifold equipped with a G-action. | |
| Feb 21, 2010 at 0:11 | history | asked | Theo Johnson-Freyd | CC BY-SA 2.5 |