Timeline for One dimensional (phi,Gamma)-modules in char p
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Mar 18, 2015 at 17:21 | history | suggested | Jeff H | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Penultimate line had two descriptions of phi, one should have been gamma
|
| Mar 18, 2015 at 16:58 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 18, 2015 at 17:21 | |||||
| Dec 12, 2010 at 22:40 | vote | accept | sibilant | ||
| Dec 11, 2010 at 6:06 | history | edited | Chandan Singh Dalawat | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Notation p(T) changed to h(T), to avoid conflict with the prime p.
|
| Dec 10, 2010 at 4:15 | vote | accept | sibilant | ||
| Dec 10, 2010 at 4:15 | |||||
| Feb 26, 2010 at 2:08 | vote | accept | sibilant | ||
| Feb 26, 2010 at 2:08 | |||||
| Feb 21, 2010 at 1:36 | comment | added | BCnrd | Yes, it looks good. This same style of calculation comes up when using Dieudonne theory to work out p-torsion commutative groups of order p^2, as well as Fontaine-Laffaille modules (as in the original paper of Fontaine-Laffaille). The fun part is to dig out the Galois action in the rings to identify exactly which character corresponds to the parameters (p_0, g_0) (which one can guess in advance, up to some inversions perhaps). I should revise the CMI lecture notes to address the general p-torsion rank-1 case (in the form of an exercise...)! As for the irreducible 2-dimensional case...oy. | |
| Feb 20, 2010 at 23:32 | history | edited | sibilant | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
clarification of one argument
|
| Feb 20, 2010 at 23:21 | history | answered | sibilant | CC BY-SA 2.5 |