Timeline for Starting Hilbert's Program on the other end
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 4, 2014 at 21:00 | comment | added | Lucas K. | One way to prove that they are not necessary is to show that ZFC can prove the absolute consistency of such simplified system. Has such proof been given? I am not convinced that further simplifications are not possible. | |
Mar 3, 2014 at 0:26 | comment | added | user5810 | @LucasK. : $\:$ If you can't drop them, then they're not unnecessary. $\;\;\;\;$ | |
Mar 2, 2014 at 21:37 | comment | added | François G. Dorais | @LucasK. Not really, see KP: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kripke%E2%80%93Platek_set_theory | |
Mar 2, 2014 at 21:18 | comment | added | Lucas K. | Those are the more obvious ones. But can you also drop unnecessary nesting of quantifyers? | |
Mar 2, 2014 at 21:15 | history | answered | user44143 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |