Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 27, 2014 at 16:56 comment added The Masked Avenger I suspect $\tau=1/2$.
Feb 27, 2014 at 16:47 comment added W-t-P Resolved - but this was a formal problem only, for the values of $S(m,q)$ for $q=0$ and also for $q>m/2$ are small, anyway.
Feb 27, 2014 at 16:45 history edited W-t-P CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body
Feb 27, 2014 at 16:39 comment added The Masked Avenger Your refined version has different ranges for q in S and sigma. Please resolve.
Feb 27, 2014 at 16:21 history edited W-t-P CC BY-SA 3.0
added 676 characters in body; edited title
Feb 27, 2014 at 5:29 answer added The Masked Avenger timeline score: 2
Feb 26, 2014 at 20:15 answer added Roland Bacher timeline score: 3
Feb 26, 2014 at 5:11 comment added Douglas Zare I think you should be able to use Laplace's method. Find the maximum term as something like $3/4 m - 1/2 q - 1/4 \sqrt{m^2+4mq-4q^2}$. Use Stirling's formula and estimate the second derivative of the logarithm of the terms there. Approximate the sum as a Gaussian whose logarithm has the same max and second derivative.
Feb 25, 2014 at 21:34 answer added Dima Pasechnik timeline score: 1
Feb 25, 2014 at 21:15 comment added The Masked Avenger It feels like I've seen the title "Estimating a sum involving binomial coefficients" on six other questions on this forum alone. In any case, break the trend! You are allowed to add things like ${\binom{n-k}{k}}^2$ to the title.
Feb 25, 2014 at 20:56 comment added Tim de Laat Perhaps you can use Stirling's Formula: $n! \sim {\sqrt {2 \pi n}}\left({\frac ne}\right)^{n}$ for large $n$.
Feb 25, 2014 at 19:43 review First posts
Feb 25, 2014 at 19:44
Feb 25, 2014 at 19:27 history asked W-t-P CC BY-SA 3.0