Timeline for Is there a canonical notion of principal divisor on a discrete dynamical system?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2013 at 12:41 | history | rollback | Ricardo Andrade |
Rollback to Revision 3
|
|
| S Nov 22, 2013 at 10:49 | history | suggested | Sergiy Kozerenko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
TeX corrections
|
| Nov 22, 2013 at 10:33 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 22, 2013 at 10:49 | |||||
| Feb 16, 2010 at 15:03 | history | edited | Steve Huntsman |
arxiv tag
|
|
| Nov 19, 2009 at 20:14 | history | edited | Ilya Nikokoshev |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 21, 2009 at 8:02 | answer | added | Harrison Brown | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 21, 2009 at 5:40 | comment | added | Greg Muller | It seems like a problem for a general discrete dynamical system would be the identicalness of the points. In the case of an algebraic curve over the algebraic closure of a finite field, the points are endowed with extra structure from the notion of functions on the set, which is exactly where Prin(X) comes from. At least in your case, the discrete set still has a notion of 'closeness' that I guess might lend enable something like Prin(X), but I don't see any candidate. | |
| Oct 21, 2009 at 4:13 | history | asked | Qiaochu Yuan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |