Timeline for Theory interpreted in non-set domain of discourse may be consistent?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2022 at 14:45 | vote | accept | kakaz | ||
| Feb 20, 2010 at 1:43 | comment | added | Mike Shulman | Of course, talking about models that are proper classes is the same as doing categorical logic in the category of classes. Can't get away from those categories! (-: | |
| Feb 19, 2010 at 17:07 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
corrected spelling
|
| Feb 19, 2010 at 14:35 | comment | added | kakaz | @Joel:"But you say that you are not especially interested in adopting that view." - of course I had heard about that point of vie, and I accept such ideas. They are interesting indeed, but are easier to find in literature than others. So here I am interested in some kind of general discussion, and not particular examples from category theory. Your answer is very informative and interesting. Thank You. As You do not reject completely my question as stupid, I assume that it is not-so-bad asked;-) so I have understood some things from our previous discussions | |
| Feb 19, 2010 at 14:17 | history | answered | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 2.5 |