Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

fixed spelling
Source Link
GH from MO
GH from MO
  • 105.4k
  • 8
  • 293
  • 398

A very throughthorough (altoughalthough a bit dense) modern treatment is given in the article of Einsiedler,Lindenstrauss Lindenstrauss,Michel Michel and Venkatesh about the ergodic theoretical proof of Duke's theorem (which is not unrelated to Gregely'sGergely's notes) - http://www.ma.huji.ac.il/~elon/Publications/Erg-Duke.pdf.

A very through (altough a bit dense) modern treatment is given in the article of Einsiedler,Lindenstrauss,Michel and Venkatesh about the ergodic theoretical proof of Duke's theorem (which is not unrelated to Gregely's notes) - http://www.ma.huji.ac.il/~elon/Publications/Erg-Duke.pdf.

A very thorough (although a bit dense) modern treatment is given in the article of Einsiedler, Lindenstrauss, Michel and Venkatesh about the ergodic theoretical proof of Duke's theorem (which is not unrelated to Gergely's notes) - http://www.ma.huji.ac.il/~elon/Publications/Erg-Duke.pdf.

Source Link
Asaf
Asaf
  • 2.5k
  • 20
  • 19

A very through (altough a bit dense) modern treatment is given in the article of Einsiedler,Lindenstrauss,Michel and Venkatesh about the ergodic theoretical proof of Duke's theorem (which is not unrelated to Gregely's notes) - http://www.ma.huji.ac.il/~elon/Publications/Erg-Duke.pdf.