Skip to main content
added 25 characters in body
Source Link
David E Speyer
  • 156.2k
  • 14
  • 419
  • 763

I know how I want to answer this question. I'll write up the easy parts here, and leave the hard part for you :).


First some minor changes. It will be convenient to clear out denominators and work with $\log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right)$. That just changes the constant term of your Fourier series by $\log 2$. Next, it is convenient to focus on $$ \int_0^1 \int_0^1 \log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right) e^{2 \pi i m x} e^{2 \pi i n y} dx dy.$$ A simple linear transformation goes between this and the cosine formulation. Let $S = \{ (z,w) : |z|=|w|=1 \}$. So we are dealing with $$\frac{1}{(2 \pi i )^2} \int_S \log \left( 4+z+z^{-1} + w +w^{-1} \right) z^{m-1} w^{n-1} dz dw.$$ Dropping out the $4 \pi ^2$, we want to show the integrand is of the form $a \pi + b$.

UPDATE: Thanks to fedja for pointing out that I had oversimplified the next paragraph.

Assuming that $(m,n) \neq (0,0)$, we can integrate by parts with respect to one of the two variables, let's say $z$. Once we do that, we will have a quantity of the form $$ (\mbox{rational number}) \cdot \int_S \frac{(z-z^{-1}) w^k z^{\ell} dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}}$$

So we'd like to show this quantity is of the form $a+b \pi$.

As fedja points out, we need to be careful here. Without the $z-z^{-1}$ term, the integral diverges like $\int \int dt du/(t^2 + u^2)$$\int \int ds dt/(s^2 + t^2)$ near $(-1,-1)$.


Whew! Now comes the actual hard part. Let $$E:=\{ (z,w) \in (\mathbb{C}^*)^2 : \ 4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1} =0 \}.$$ ThisThis is an elliptic curve with four punctures. As Bjorn points out, this is an elliptic curve with four puncturesa nodal cubic and can be parameterized as $$(z,w) = \left( \frac{1-u}{u(1+u)}, \frac{u(u-1)}{1+u} \right).$$ We'll come back to this point later. 

The $2$-form $dw dz/(4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1})$ has a simple pole on $E$. Let $\omega$ be the $1$-form on $E$ which is the residue of that $2$-form.

I think there should be a curve $\gamma$ in $E$ such that $S$ is homotopic, in $(\mathbb{C}^*)^2 \setminus E$, to a tubular neighborhood of $\gamma$. So $$\int_S \frac{w^k z^{\ell} (z-z^{-1}) dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}} = \int_{\gamma} \omega w^k z^{\ell} (z - z^{-1}) .$$


 

And, well, this is where I wimp out. If $E$ is any elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$we substitute in the above parameterization, $\gamma$this will be the integral around a curveclosed loop of some rational function in $E$$\mathbb{Q}(u)$. In particular, we can compute this integral by residues and $\eta$ any meromorphic $1$-form defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, then $\int_{\gamma} \eta$ should bewe will get something of the form $a+b \pi + c \alpha + d \beta$$a+b \pi$, where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are the periods of $E$as desired. The classical way

Actually, it looks to state this is that everything can be expressed in terms ofme like we should just get complete elliptic integrals of the first, second and third kind$b \pi$. Maybe the integration by parts doesn't go as well as I hoped?

 

But I don't know why you aren't seeing those period termsObviously, andsomeone should actually work this out explicitly, but I don't know how to make this explicit. So I'm going to stop herethink it will be me.

I know how I want to answer this question. I'll write up the easy parts here, and leave the hard part for you :).


First some minor changes. It will be convenient to clear out denominators and work with $\log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right)$. That just changes the constant term of your Fourier series by $\log 2$. Next, it is convenient to focus on $$ \int_0^1 \int_0^1 \log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right) e^{2 \pi i m x} e^{2 \pi i n y} dx dy.$$ A simple linear transformation goes between this and the cosine formulation. Let $S = \{ (z,w) : |z|=|w|=1 \}$. So we are dealing with $$\frac{1}{(2 \pi i )^2} \int_S \log \left( 4+z+z^{-1} + w +w^{-1} \right) z^{m-1} w^{n-1} dz dw.$$ Dropping out the $4 \pi ^2$, we want to show the integrand is of the form $a \pi + b$.

UPDATE: Thanks to fedja for pointing out that I had oversimplified the next paragraph.

Assuming that $(m,n) \neq (0,0)$, we can integrate by parts with respect to one of the two variables, let's say $z$. Once we do that, we will have a quantity of the form $$ (\mbox{rational number}) \cdot \int_S \frac{(z-z^{-1}) w^k z^{\ell} dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}}$$

So we'd like to show this quantity is of the form $a+b \pi$.

As fedja points out, we need to be careful here. Without the $z-z^{-1}$ term, the integral diverges like $\int \int dt du/(t^2 + u^2)$ near $(-1,-1)$.


Whew! Now comes the actual hard part. Let $$E:=\{ (z,w) \in (\mathbb{C}^*)^2 : \ 4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1} =0 \}.$$ This is an elliptic curve with four punctures. The $2$-form $dw dz/(4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1})$ has a simple pole on $E$. Let $\omega$ be the $1$-form on $E$ which is the residue of that $2$-form.

I think there should be a curve $\gamma$ in $E$ such that $S$ is homotopic, in $(\mathbb{C}^*)^2 \setminus E$, to a tubular neighborhood of $\gamma$. So $$\int_S \frac{w^k z^{\ell} (z-z^{-1}) dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}} = \int_{\gamma} \omega w^k z^{\ell} (z - z^{-1}) .$$


 

And, well, this is where I wimp out. If $E$ is any elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, $\gamma$ a curve in $E$, and $\eta$ any meromorphic $1$-form defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, then $\int_{\gamma} \eta$ should be of the form $a+b \pi + c \alpha + d \beta$, where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are the periods of $E$. The classical way to state this is that everything can be expressed in terms of complete elliptic integrals of the first, second and third kind.

But I don't know why you aren't seeing those period terms, and I don't know how to make this explicit. So I'm going to stop here.

I know how I want to answer this question. I'll write up the easy parts here, and leave the hard part for you :).


First some minor changes. It will be convenient to clear out denominators and work with $\log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right)$. That just changes the constant term of your Fourier series by $\log 2$. Next, it is convenient to focus on $$ \int_0^1 \int_0^1 \log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right) e^{2 \pi i m x} e^{2 \pi i n y} dx dy.$$ A simple linear transformation goes between this and the cosine formulation. Let $S = \{ (z,w) : |z|=|w|=1 \}$. So we are dealing with $$\frac{1}{(2 \pi i )^2} \int_S \log \left( 4+z+z^{-1} + w +w^{-1} \right) z^{m-1} w^{n-1} dz dw.$$ Dropping out the $4 \pi ^2$, we want to show the integrand is of the form $a \pi + b$.

UPDATE: Thanks to fedja for pointing out that I had oversimplified the next paragraph.

Assuming that $(m,n) \neq (0,0)$, we can integrate by parts with respect to one of the two variables, let's say $z$. Once we do that, we will have a quantity of the form $$ (\mbox{rational number}) \cdot \int_S \frac{(z-z^{-1}) w^k z^{\ell} dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}}$$

So we'd like to show this quantity is of the form $a+b \pi$.

As fedja points out, we need to be careful here. Without the $z-z^{-1}$ term, the integral diverges like $\int \int ds dt/(s^2 + t^2)$ near $(-1,-1)$.


Whew! Now comes the actual hard part. Let $$E:=\{ (z,w) \in (\mathbb{C}^*)^2 : \ 4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1} =0 \}.$$ This is an elliptic curve with four punctures. As Bjorn points out, this is a nodal cubic and can be parameterized as $$(z,w) = \left( \frac{1-u}{u(1+u)}, \frac{u(u-1)}{1+u} \right).$$ We'll come back to this point later. 

The $2$-form $dw dz/(4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1})$ has a simple pole on $E$. Let $\omega$ be the $1$-form on $E$ which is the residue of that $2$-form.

I think there should be a curve $\gamma$ in $E$ such that $S$ is homotopic, in $(\mathbb{C}^*)^2 \setminus E$, to a tubular neighborhood of $\gamma$. So $$\int_S \frac{w^k z^{\ell} (z-z^{-1}) dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}} = \int_{\gamma} \omega w^k z^{\ell} (z - z^{-1}) .$$

If we substitute in the above parameterization, this will be the integral around a closed loop of some rational function in $\mathbb{Q}(u)$. In particular, we can compute this integral by residues and we will get something of the form $a+b \pi$, as desired.

Actually, it looks to me like we should just get $b \pi$. Maybe the integration by parts doesn't go as well as I hoped?

 

Obviously, someone should actually work this out explicitly, but I don't think it will be me.

added 180 characters in body; edited body
Source Link
David E Speyer
  • 156.2k
  • 14
  • 419
  • 763

I know how I want to answer this question. I'll write up the easy parts here, and leave the hard part for you :).


First some minor changes. It will be convenient to clear out denominators and work with $\log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right)$. That just changes the constant term of your Fourier series by $\log 2$. Next, it is convenient to focus on $$ \int_0^1 \int_0^1 \log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right) e^{2 \pi i m x} e^{2 \pi i n y} dx dy.$$ A simple linear transformation goes between this and the cosine formulation. Let $S = \{ (z,w) : |z|=|w|=1 \}$. So we are dealing with $$\frac{1}{(2 \pi i )^2} \int_S \log \left( 4+z+z^{-1} + w +w^{-1} \right) z^{m-1} w^{n-1} dz dw.$$ Dropping out the $4 \pi ^2$, we want to show the integrand is of the form $a \pi + b$. Now, assuming

UPDATE: Thanks to fedja for pointing out that I had oversimplified the next paragraph.

Assuming that $(m,n) \neq (0,0)$, we can integrate by parts with respect to one of the two variables, let's say $z$. Once we do that, we will have a quantity of the form $$ (\mbox{rational number}) \cdot \int_S \frac{w^k z^{\ell} dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}}$$ I would focus on showing$$ (\mbox{rational number}) \cdot \int_S \frac{(z-z^{-1}) w^k z^{\ell} dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}}$$

So we'd like to show this integralquantity is of the form $a \pi +b$$a+b \pi$. I think that

As fedja points out, oncewe need to be careful here. Without the problem is cast in this form$z-z^{-1}$ term, there should no longer be any exceptional behavior at the originintegral diverges like $\int \int dt du/(t^2 + u^2)$ near $(-1,-1)$.


Whew! Now comes the actual hard part. Let $$E:=\{ (z,w) \in (\mathbb{C}^*)^2 : \ 4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1} =0 \}.$$ This is an elliptic curve with four punctures. The $2$-form $dw dz/(4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1})$ has a simple pole on $E$. Let $\omega$ be the $1$-form on $E$ which is the residue of that $2$-form.

I think there should be a curve $\gamma$ in $E$ such that $S$ is homotopic, in $(\mathbb{C}^*)^2 \setminus E$, to a tubular neighborhood of $\gamma$. So $$\int_S \frac{w^k z^{\ell} dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}} = \int_{\gamma} \omega w^k z^{\ell}.$$$$\int_S \frac{w^k z^{\ell} (z-z^{-1}) dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}} = \int_{\gamma} \omega w^k z^{\ell} (z - z^{-1}) .$$


And, well, this is where I wimp out. If $E$ is any elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, $\gamma$ a curve in $E$, and $\eta$ any meromorphic $1$-form defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, then $\int_{\gamma} \eta$ should be of the form $a+b \pi + c \alpha + d \beta$, where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are the periods of $E$. The classical way to state this is that everything can be expressed in terms of complete elliptic integrals of the first, second and third kind.

But I don't know why you aren't seeing those period terms, and I don't know how to make this explicit. So I'm going to stop here.

I know how I want to answer this question. I'll write up the easy parts here, and leave the hard part for you :).


First some minor changes. It will be convenient to clear out denominators and work with $\log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right)$. That just changes the constant term of your Fourier series by $\log 2$. Next, it is convenient to focus on $$ \int_0^1 \int_0^1 \log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right) e^{2 \pi i m x} e^{2 \pi i n y} dx dy.$$ A simple linear transformation goes between this and the cosine formulation. Let $S = \{ (z,w) : |z|=|w|=1 \}$. So we are dealing with $$\frac{1}{(2 \pi i )^2} \int_S \log \left( 4+z+z^{-1} + w +w^{-1} \right) z^{m-1} w^{n-1} dz dw.$$ Dropping out the $4 \pi ^2$, we want to show the integrand is of the form $a \pi + b$. Now, assuming that $(m,n) \neq (0,0)$, we can integrate by parts with respect to one of the two variables. Once we do that, we will have a quantity of the form $$ (\mbox{rational number}) \cdot \int_S \frac{w^k z^{\ell} dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}}$$ I would focus on showing this integral is of the form $a \pi +b$. I think that, once the problem is cast in this form, there should no longer be any exceptional behavior at the origin.


Whew! Now comes the actual hard part. Let $$E:=\{ (z,w) \in (\mathbb{C}^*)^2 : \ 4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1} =0 \}.$$ This is an elliptic curve with four punctures. The $2$-form $dw dz/(4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1})$ has a simple pole on $E$. Let $\omega$ be the $1$-form on $E$ which is the residue of that $2$-form.

I think there should be a curve $\gamma$ in $E$ such that $S$ is homotopic, in $(\mathbb{C}^*)^2 \setminus E$, to a tubular neighborhood of $\gamma$. So $$\int_S \frac{w^k z^{\ell} dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}} = \int_{\gamma} \omega w^k z^{\ell}.$$


And, well, this is where I wimp out. If $E$ is any elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, $\gamma$ a curve in $E$, and $\eta$ any meromorphic $1$-form defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, then $\int_{\gamma} \eta$ should be of the form $a+b \pi + c \alpha + d \beta$, where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are the periods of $E$. The classical way to state this is that everything can be expressed in terms of complete elliptic integrals of the first, second and third kind.

But I don't know why you aren't seeing those period terms, and I don't know how to make this explicit. So I'm going to stop here.

I know how I want to answer this question. I'll write up the easy parts here, and leave the hard part for you :).


First some minor changes. It will be convenient to clear out denominators and work with $\log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right)$. That just changes the constant term of your Fourier series by $\log 2$. Next, it is convenient to focus on $$ \int_0^1 \int_0^1 \log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right) e^{2 \pi i m x} e^{2 \pi i n y} dx dy.$$ A simple linear transformation goes between this and the cosine formulation. Let $S = \{ (z,w) : |z|=|w|=1 \}$. So we are dealing with $$\frac{1}{(2 \pi i )^2} \int_S \log \left( 4+z+z^{-1} + w +w^{-1} \right) z^{m-1} w^{n-1} dz dw.$$ Dropping out the $4 \pi ^2$, we want to show the integrand is of the form $a \pi + b$.

UPDATE: Thanks to fedja for pointing out that I had oversimplified the next paragraph.

Assuming that $(m,n) \neq (0,0)$, we can integrate by parts with respect to one of the two variables, let's say $z$. Once we do that, we will have a quantity of the form $$ (\mbox{rational number}) \cdot \int_S \frac{(z-z^{-1}) w^k z^{\ell} dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}}$$

So we'd like to show this quantity is of the form $a+b \pi$.

As fedja points out, we need to be careful here. Without the $z-z^{-1}$ term, the integral diverges like $\int \int dt du/(t^2 + u^2)$ near $(-1,-1)$.


Whew! Now comes the actual hard part. Let $$E:=\{ (z,w) \in (\mathbb{C}^*)^2 : \ 4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1} =0 \}.$$ This is an elliptic curve with four punctures. The $2$-form $dw dz/(4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1})$ has a simple pole on $E$. Let $\omega$ be the $1$-form on $E$ which is the residue of that $2$-form.

I think there should be a curve $\gamma$ in $E$ such that $S$ is homotopic, in $(\mathbb{C}^*)^2 \setminus E$, to a tubular neighborhood of $\gamma$. So $$\int_S \frac{w^k z^{\ell} (z-z^{-1}) dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}} = \int_{\gamma} \omega w^k z^{\ell} (z - z^{-1}) .$$


And, well, this is where I wimp out. If $E$ is any elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, $\gamma$ a curve in $E$, and $\eta$ any meromorphic $1$-form defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, then $\int_{\gamma} \eta$ should be of the form $a+b \pi + c \alpha + d \beta$, where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are the periods of $E$. The classical way to state this is that everything can be expressed in terms of complete elliptic integrals of the first, second and third kind.

But I don't know why you aren't seeing those period terms, and I don't know how to make this explicit. So I'm going to stop here.

edited body
Source Link
David E Speyer
  • 156.2k
  • 14
  • 419
  • 763

I know how I want to answer this question. I'll write up the easy parts here, and leave the hard part for you :).


First some minor changes. It will be convenient to clear out denominators and work with $\log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right)$. That just changes the constant term of your Fourier series by $\log 2$. Next, it is convenient to focus on $$ \int_0^1 \int_0^1 \log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right) e^{2 \pi i m x} e^{2 \pi i n y} dx dy.$$ A simple linear transformation goes between this and the cosine formulation. Let $S = \{ (z,w) : |z|=|w|=1 \}$. So we are dealing with $$\frac{1}{(2 \pi i )^2} \int_S \log \left( 4+z+z^{-1} + w +w^{-1} \right) z^{m-1} w^{n-1} dz dw.$$ Dropping out the $4 \pi ^2$, we want to show the integrand is of the form $a \pi + b$. Now, assuming that $(m,n) \neq (0,0)$, we can integrate by parts with respect to one of the two variables. Once we do that, we will have a quantity of the form $$ (\mbox{rational number}) \cdot \int_S \frac{w^k z^{\ell} dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}}$$ I would focus on showing this integral is of the form $a \pi +b$. I think that, once the problem is cast in this form, there should no longer be any exceptional behavior at the origin.


Whew! Now comes the actual hard part. Let $$E:=\{ (z,w) \in (\mathbb{C}^*)^2 : \ 4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1} =0 \}.$$ This is an elliptic curve with four punctures. The $2$-form $dw dz/(4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1})$ has a simple pole on $E$. Let $\omega$ be the one form$1$-form on $E$ which is the residue of that $2$-form.

I think there should be a curve $\gamma$ in $E$ such that $S$ is homotopic, in $(\mathbb{C}^*)^2 \setminus E$, to a tubular neighborhood of $\gamma$. So $$\int_S \frac{w^k z^{\ell} dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}} = \int_{\gamma} \omega w^k z^{\ell}.$$


And, well, this is where I wimp out. If $E$ is any elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, $\gamma$ a curve in $E$, and $\eta$ any meromorphic $1$-form defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, then $\int_{\gamma} \eta$ should be of the form $a+b \pi + c \alpha + d \beta$, where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are the periods of $E$. The classical way to state this is that everything can be expressed in terms of complete elliptic integrals of the first, second and third kind.

But I don't know why you aren't seeing those period terms, and I don't know how to make this explicit. So I'm going to stop here.

I know how I want to answer this question. I'll write up the easy parts here, and leave the hard part for you :).


First some minor changes. It will be convenient to clear out denominators and work with $\log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right)$. That just changes the constant term of your Fourier series by $\log 2$. Next, it is convenient to focus on $$ \int_0^1 \int_0^1 \log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right) e^{2 \pi i m x} e^{2 \pi i n y} dx dy.$$ A simple linear transformation goes between this and the cosine formulation. Let $S = \{ (z,w) : |z|=|w|=1 \}$. So we are dealing with $$\frac{1}{(2 \pi i )^2} \int_S \log \left( 4+z+z^{-1} + w +w^{-1} \right) z^{m-1} w^{n-1} dz dw.$$ Dropping out the $4 \pi ^2$, we want to show the integrand is of the form $a \pi + b$. Now, assuming that $(m,n) \neq (0,0)$, we can integrate by parts with respect to one of the two variables. Once we do that, we will have a quantity of the form $$ (\mbox{rational number}) \cdot \int_S \frac{w^k z^{\ell} dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}}$$ I would focus on showing this integral is of the form $a \pi +b$. I think that, once the problem is cast in this form, there should no longer be any exceptional behavior at the origin.


Whew! Now comes the actual hard part. Let $$E:=\{ (z,w) \in (\mathbb{C}^*)^2 : \ 4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1} =0 \}.$$ This is an elliptic curve with four punctures. The $2$-form $dw dz/(4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1})$ has a simple pole on $E$. Let $\omega$ be the one form on $E$ which is the residue of that $2$-form.

I think there should be a curve $\gamma$ in $E$ such that $S$ is homotopic, in $(\mathbb{C}^*)^2 \setminus E$, to a tubular neighborhood of $\gamma$. So $$\int_S \frac{w^k z^{\ell} dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}} = \int_{\gamma} \omega w^k z^{\ell}.$$


And, well, this is where I wimp out. If $E$ is any elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, $\gamma$ a curve in $E$, and $\eta$ any meromorphic $1$-form defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, then $\int_{\gamma} \eta$ should be of the form $a+b \pi + c \alpha + d \beta$, where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are the periods of $E$. The classical way to state this is that everything can be expressed in terms of complete elliptic integrals of the first, second and third kind.

But I don't know why you aren't seeing those period terms, and I don't know how to make this explicit. So I'm going to stop here.

I know how I want to answer this question. I'll write up the easy parts here, and leave the hard part for you :).


First some minor changes. It will be convenient to clear out denominators and work with $\log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right)$. That just changes the constant term of your Fourier series by $\log 2$. Next, it is convenient to focus on $$ \int_0^1 \int_0^1 \log \left( 4 + e^{2 \pi i x} + e^{- 2 \pi i x} + e^{2 \pi i y} + e^{- 2 \pi i y} \right) e^{2 \pi i m x} e^{2 \pi i n y} dx dy.$$ A simple linear transformation goes between this and the cosine formulation. Let $S = \{ (z,w) : |z|=|w|=1 \}$. So we are dealing with $$\frac{1}{(2 \pi i )^2} \int_S \log \left( 4+z+z^{-1} + w +w^{-1} \right) z^{m-1} w^{n-1} dz dw.$$ Dropping out the $4 \pi ^2$, we want to show the integrand is of the form $a \pi + b$. Now, assuming that $(m,n) \neq (0,0)$, we can integrate by parts with respect to one of the two variables. Once we do that, we will have a quantity of the form $$ (\mbox{rational number}) \cdot \int_S \frac{w^k z^{\ell} dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}}$$ I would focus on showing this integral is of the form $a \pi +b$. I think that, once the problem is cast in this form, there should no longer be any exceptional behavior at the origin.


Whew! Now comes the actual hard part. Let $$E:=\{ (z,w) \in (\mathbb{C}^*)^2 : \ 4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1} =0 \}.$$ This is an elliptic curve with four punctures. The $2$-form $dw dz/(4+z+z^{-1}+w+w^{-1})$ has a simple pole on $E$. Let $\omega$ be the $1$-form on $E$ which is the residue of that $2$-form.

I think there should be a curve $\gamma$ in $E$ such that $S$ is homotopic, in $(\mathbb{C}^*)^2 \setminus E$, to a tubular neighborhood of $\gamma$. So $$\int_S \frac{w^k z^{\ell} dw dz} {4+w+w^{-1}+z+z^{-1}} = \int_{\gamma} \omega w^k z^{\ell}.$$


And, well, this is where I wimp out. If $E$ is any elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, $\gamma$ a curve in $E$, and $\eta$ any meromorphic $1$-form defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, then $\int_{\gamma} \eta$ should be of the form $a+b \pi + c \alpha + d \beta$, where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are the periods of $E$. The classical way to state this is that everything can be expressed in terms of complete elliptic integrals of the first, second and third kind.

But I don't know why you aren't seeing those period terms, and I don't know how to make this explicit. So I'm going to stop here.

Source Link
David E Speyer
  • 156.2k
  • 14
  • 419
  • 763
Loading