Skip to main content
22 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 23 at 20:34 history edited Martin Sleziak
edited tags
Mar 15, 2014 at 7:43 review Reopen votes
Mar 17, 2014 at 0:27
Feb 16, 2014 at 1:23 vote accept CommunityBot
Feb 16, 2014 at 1:23 vote accept CommunityBot
Feb 16, 2014 at 1:23
Feb 16, 2014 at 1:22 vote accept CommunityBot
Feb 16, 2014 at 1:23
Feb 15, 2014 at 6:53 comment added Andrej Bauer This is not research-level. It is like asking "what are some real-life applications of PDE's?" I am nailing the last nail on the coffin.
Feb 15, 2014 at 6:51 history closed Andrés E. Caicedo
Andy Putman
Steven Landsburg
Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
Andrej Bauer
Needs more focus
Feb 15, 2014 at 2:33 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble
Feb 15, 2014 at 2:19 comment added Carl Mummert I have added the obligatory subject tag
Feb 15, 2014 at 2:18 history edited Carl Mummert
edited tags
Feb 15, 2014 at 2:13 comment added usul I don't see the issue. To me, it's an interesting and reasonable question. No further explanation or background is needed to get the point of the question across (not saying more would hurt). And I would hope that saying something has no practical applications is merely an observation rather than a value judgement.
Feb 15, 2014 at 1:39 comment added Carl Mummert "No, there are absolutely no practical applications; the entire field is simply a waste of time by sheltered academics." I am not voting to close because of the comments by @Noah S, but I think this question falls into the "subjective and argumentative" close reason.
Feb 15, 2014 at 0:15 comment added Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine @Noah: besides Andy Putman's reasons, I voted to close because "in real life" is extremely broad and subjective, and rarely leads to interesting content. And, indeed, the contentful parts of the answers so far are those that explicitly drop the "in real life" part of the question.
Feb 14, 2014 at 22:51 history edited Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen CC BY-SA 3.0
added 196 characters in body
Feb 14, 2014 at 21:49 comment added Andy Putman I voted to close because it is a lazy and poorly thought out question (and the OP has flooded the site with multiple such questions today). If you like it enough to keep it open, edit it to make it a good question.
Feb 14, 2014 at 21:43 comment added Noah Schweber Given that there are three votes to close, and my previous comment has four upvotes, could those voting to close please explain their reasons?
Feb 14, 2014 at 21:42 answer added Noah Schweber timeline score: 9
Feb 14, 2014 at 20:31 comment added Noah Schweber I disagree with the votes to close this question; I think more work could have been put into asking it, but I also think it's definitely appropriate for MO.
Feb 14, 2014 at 19:59 review Close votes
Feb 15, 2014 at 6:55
Feb 14, 2014 at 19:18 history edited Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
edited tags
Feb 14, 2014 at 19:17 answer added Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen timeline score: 19
Feb 14, 2014 at 18:35 history asked user46976 CC BY-SA 3.0