Timeline for The biggest class of schemes which the reduction principle holds
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Feb 10, 2014 at 15:33 | vote | accept | Fujita Tomomi | ||
| Feb 10, 2014 at 14:31 | answer | added | jmc | timeline score: 9 | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 11:11 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | As far as I can tell, the same characterization holds if you replace "schemes" with "morphisms". | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 9:39 | comment | added | jmc | “Is there an obvious property $P$ which satisfies above properties and holds only for quasi-compact, quasi-separated schemes?” — How about the property qcqs? (I.e., being quasi-compact and quasi-seperated.) | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 9:24 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Presumably induction has something to do with it, hence quasi-compactness, and I gather quasi-separatedness is related to intersections of open affines being affine. But an expert should really step in and answer this. | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 7:57 | history | asked | Fujita Tomomi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |