Timeline for Simultaneous decomposition of modules over Dedekind domains
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2014 at 16:02 | comment | added | user76758 | @user75148: It does prove what you asked. I'm not aware of any specific reference with this result. If you have a friend or colleague who knows a bit more commutative algebra, perhaps if they look at this answer then they can try to explain it to you in terms that are more accessible (I don't know your background). As a student, I found that many puzzling facts about Dedekind domains became far more transparent once I learned some more commutative algebra, to enable me to attack questions about ideals in the more robust framework of abstract projective and invertible modules. | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 15:39 | comment | added | user75148 | well I appreciate your answer, but I can't really work it out. I'm not even sure that it proves, what we set out to prove - i'd indeed be thankful for a reference though! | |
| S Feb 6, 2014 at 15:51 | history | answered | user76758 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | |
| S Feb 6, 2014 at 15:51 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by user76758 |