Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

What is a relevant non commutative analogues for the following fact, in term of spectral triples and cyclic cohomology?:

"If $M$ is a compact oriantable manifold without boundary and $X\subset M$ is a proper subset with inclusion $i: X \to M$, then $i^*$ is not a ring isomorphism in cohomology"

I asked the commutative version in the following post:

A closed manifold with a subset with the same ring cohomologyA closed manifold with a subset with the same ring cohomology

What is a relevant non commutative analogues for the following fact, in term of spectral triples and cyclic cohomology?:

"If $M$ is a compact oriantable manifold without boundary and $X\subset M$ is a proper subset with inclusion $i: X \to M$, then $i^*$ is not a ring isomorphism in cohomology"

I asked the commutative version in the following post:

A closed manifold with a subset with the same ring cohomology

What is a relevant non commutative analogues for the following fact, in term of spectral triples and cyclic cohomology?:

"If $M$ is a compact oriantable manifold without boundary and $X\subset M$ is a proper subset with inclusion $i: X \to M$, then $i^*$ is not a ring isomorphism in cohomology"

I asked the commutative version in the following post:

A closed manifold with a subset with the same ring cohomology

Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123

Non Commutative analogues of a commutative fact

What is a relevant non commutative analogues for the following fact, in term of spectral triples and cyclic cohomology?:

"If $M$ is a compact oriantable manifold without boundary and $X\subset M$ is a proper subset with inclusion $i: X \to M$, then $i^*$ is not a ring isomorphism in cohomology"

I asked the commutative version in the following post:

A closed manifold with a subset with the same ring cohomology