Timeline for Reconstructing a (unitary) matrix from the determinant of its sub-matrices
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2014 at 20:22 | comment | added | Wlodek Kuperberg | Evidently, I misinterpreted the question. Sorry. | |
| Feb 3, 2014 at 18:05 | answer | added | Liviu Nicolaescu | timeline score: 9 | |
| Feb 3, 2014 at 17:40 | history | edited | benkj | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added the proper range of M I'm interested in
|
| Feb 3, 2014 at 17:38 | comment | added | benkj | You are right, thanks... but unfortunately when M=1 or M=N-1 the original problem is quite trivial | |
| Feb 3, 2014 at 17:31 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | Do you know that the adjoint is the case when M=N-1? I suspect Cayley or Sylvester handled cases for other M. Gerhard "Does More Solitary Than Unitary" Paseman, 2014.02.03 | |
| Feb 3, 2014 at 17:21 | comment | added | benkj | No, I can solve a research problem if there is a solution to this "homework" :-/ | |
| Feb 3, 2014 at 17:13 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Feb 3, 2014 at 17:24 | |||||
| Feb 3, 2014 at 17:10 | comment | added | Wlodek Kuperberg | Homework assignment...? | |
| Feb 3, 2014 at 17:03 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 3, 2014 at 17:24 | |||||
| Feb 3, 2014 at 16:48 | history | asked | benkj | CC BY-SA 3.0 |