Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 8, 2014 at 5:10 vote accept David Ong
Feb 4, 2014 at 22:33 comment added Claudio Gorodski @qswang: I am no expert on this matter, but a quick search in the literature seems to indicate that the claim of Scheuneman to have proved the Auslander conjecture in full was incorrect, so indeed Fried found a counterexample, namely, a simply-transitivve affine action of a 3-step nilpotent 4-dimensional connected and simply-connected Lie group in which the only element acting as a pure translation is the identity. Nevertheless, the conjecture has been shown to hold for some classes of groups, for instance in dimension $3$ (by Fried and Goldman).
Feb 4, 2014 at 12:45 comment added David Ong The conjecture was came from " Simply transitive groups of affine motions" of L. Auslander.
Feb 4, 2014 at 12:40 comment added David Ong $\mathfrak g=\{\tau_v+\varphi(v):v\in V$ Is this implies G consists all pure translations in U which is not empty? In the affine motion case,the conjecture that "any nilpotent simply transitive group of affine motions must contain a one-parameter group of pure translations in its centre" was verified by JOHN SCHEUNEMAN in "TRANSLATIONS IN CERTAIN GROUPS OF AFFINE MOTIONS",and an counterexample by D. Fried occured in "Distality, completeness and affine structures" Its confusing. Who is right? Is there any reference of simply transitive group of Rigid Motion rather than affine motion?
Feb 1, 2014 at 16:48 history edited Claudio Gorodski CC BY-SA 3.0
Corrected typo.
Feb 1, 2014 at 16:38 history undeleted Claudio Gorodski
Feb 1, 2014 at 16:38 history edited Claudio Gorodski CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2322 characters in body
Feb 1, 2014 at 16:16 history deleted Claudio Gorodski via Vote
Feb 1, 2014 at 15:56 history answered Claudio Gorodski CC BY-SA 3.0