Timeline for Lattice points in dilated polytopes and sumsets
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2014 at 11:56 | vote | accept | Per Alexandersson | ||
| Jan 31, 2014 at 15:38 | comment | added | Per Alexandersson | You are welcome. Now, when I read the paper by Nathanson and Ruzsa, they define something which is called "height" of a point in $\mathbb{N}^d$, which is just the sum of the coordinates. They use this in an essential way, and the problem I am looking at has a nice property related to this. Maybe that can explain why I get polynomials for those... | |
| Jan 31, 2014 at 14:36 | comment | added | Lucia | Thanks for the reference to Nathanson and Ruzsa, which I hadn't seen before. | |
| Jan 31, 2014 at 14:27 | comment | added | Per Alexandersson | Ah, thank you, this put me into a nice track. I found a proof of eventual polynomiality here: www.emis.de/journals/JTNB/2002-2/NathansonRuzsa.ps. I have to read a bit more, but most results only give polynomiality for n large. | |
| Jan 31, 2014 at 11:57 | history | edited | Lucia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 78 characters in body
|
| Jan 31, 2014 at 11:47 | history | answered | Lucia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |