Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

added one link
Source Link
edit approved Jan 29, 2014 at 21:06
F. C.
edit approved Jan 29, 2014 at 21:06
F. C.
  • 3.6k
  • 20
  • 30

The answer seems to be yes. I think this was proved by Kuhlmann, Pank, and Roquette, "Immediate and purely wild extensions of valued fields""Immediate and purely wild extensions of valued fields", Manuscripta math. 55 (1986), 39-67. A short proof is given in Efrat's book on valuation theory, p. 203.

The answer seems to be yes. I think this was proved by Kuhlmann, Pank, and Roquette, "Immediate and purely wild extensions of valued fields", Manuscripta math. 55 (1986), 39-67. A short proof is given in Efrat's book on valuation theory, p. 203.

The answer seems to be yes. I think this was proved by Kuhlmann, Pank, and Roquette, "Immediate and purely wild extensions of valued fields", Manuscripta math. 55 (1986), 39-67. A short proof is given in Efrat's book on valuation theory, p. 203.

Source Link
loretzini
loretzini
  • 46
  • 1

The answer seems to be yes. I think this was proved by Kuhlmann, Pank, and Roquette, "Immediate and purely wild extensions of valued fields", Manuscripta math. 55 (1986), 39-67. A short proof is given in Efrat's book on valuation theory, p. 203.