Timeline for What is the correct formulation of the CDE triangle?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2010 at 15:19 | history | edited | Ben Webster♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 23, 2010 at 13:30 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | @Bruce: It's probably a good idea to add a tag like rt.representation-theory to be flexible about the possible directions. | |
| Jun 23, 2010 at 13:16 | comment | added | GS | Is it true that really understanding what you're asking for would allow one to settle the James conjecture (relating Hecke alg. reps at a root of unity to modular reps of the corresponding Weyl group)? If I remember correctly, one consequence of this would be that if p^2>n for a prime p, then (working w/ $W=S_n$ the symmetric group) simple modules for the Hecke algebra at a pth root of unity stay simple upon reduction mod p. | |
| Jun 23, 2010 at 12:47 | answer | added | Jim Humphreys | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 23, 2010 at 10:02 | history | edited | Charles Matthews | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
typo
|
| Feb 17, 2010 at 16:10 | answer | added | Ben Webster♦ | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 17, 2010 at 11:45 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 17, 2010 at 11:37 | history | asked | Bruce Westbury | CC BY-SA 2.5 |