Skip to main content
edited title
Link
user39066
user39066

Large andvs Small Gauge transformations and Gauge invariancePhysical theories

deleted 591 characters in body
Source Link
user39066
user39066

I just realized I am not very comfortable withcan't decipher the terminology ofdifference between large and small gauge transformations[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_gauge_transformation ]. I've done some digging around and even looked through some previous posts about this on the physics exchange.

It turns out to be important in string theory, and can crop up in more elementary details of Yang-Mills as per @Luboš Motl. My ignorance of this came uptransformations especially in a discussion on physics exchange, @Hunter comments on @user1504 answer http://physics.stackexchange.com/q/94981 and his previous inquiryits applications in physics exchange have brought me to this point.

Clarify this difference. Can someone describe how it crops up in Quantum Yang-Mills? IfIf perhaps one can engineer a simple physical theory that has such a transformation to describe its subtleties it would be great.

As usual I love really simple explanations as I am not any sort of expert. Diverse responses welcome. . . .

I don't know if I pose the question correctly, but please feel free to edit it.

I just realized I am not very comfortable with the terminology of large and small gauge transformations[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_gauge_transformation ]. I've done some digging around and even looked through some previous posts about this on the physics exchange.

It turns out to be important in string theory, and can crop up in more elementary details of Yang-Mills as per @Luboš Motl. My ignorance of this came up in a discussion on physics exchange, @Hunter comments on @user1504 answer http://physics.stackexchange.com/q/94981 and his previous inquiry in physics exchange have brought me to this point.

Clarify this difference. Can someone describe how it crops up in Quantum Yang-Mills? If perhaps one can engineer a simple physical theory that has such a transformation to describe its subtleties it would be great.

As usual I love really simple explanations as I am not any sort of expert.

I don't know if I pose the question correctly, but please feel free to edit it.

I can't decipher the difference between large and small gauge transformations especially in its applications in physics.If perhaps one can engineer a simple physical theory that has such a transformation to describe its subtleties it would be great.

As usual I love really simple explanations as I am not any sort of expert. Diverse responses welcome. . . .

I don't know if I pose the question correctly, but please feel free to edit it.

removed deprecated tag 'topology'
Source Link
Ricardo Andrade
  • 6.2k
  • 5
  • 42
  • 69

I just realized I am not very comfortable with the terminology of large and small gauge transformations[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_gauge_transformation ]. I've done some digging around and even looked through some previous posts about this on the physics exchange.

It turns out to be important in string theory, and can crop up in more elementary details of Yang-Mills as per @Luboš Motl  . My ignorance of this came up in a discussion on physics exhcangeexchange, @Hunter comments on @user1504 answer http://physics.stackexchange.com/q/94981 and his previous inquiry in physics exchange have brought me to this point.

Clarify this difference. Can someone describe how it crops up in Quantum Yang-Mills,? If perhaps one can engineer a simple physical theory that has such a transformation to describe its subtleties it would be great.

As usual I love really simple explanations as I am not any sort of expert.

I don't know if I pose the question correctly, but please feel free to edit it.

I just realized I am not very comfortable with the terminology of large and small gauge transformations[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_gauge_transformation ]. I've done some digging around and even looked through some previous posts about this on the physics exchange.

It turns out to be important in string theory, and can crop up in more elementary details of Yang-Mills as per @Luboš Motl  . My ignorance of this came up in a discussion on physics exhcange, @Hunter comments on @user1504 answer http://physics.stackexchange.com/q/94981 and his previous inquiry in physics exchange have brought me to this point.

Clarify this difference. Can someone describe how it crops up in Quantum Yang-Mills, If perhaps one can engineer a simple physical theory that has such a transformation to describe its subtleties it would be great.

As usual I love really simple explanations as I am not any sort of expert.

I don't know if I pose the question correctly, but please feel free to edit it.

I just realized I am not very comfortable with the terminology of large and small gauge transformations[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_gauge_transformation ]. I've done some digging around and even looked through some previous posts about this on the physics exchange.

It turns out to be important in string theory, and can crop up in more elementary details of Yang-Mills as per @Luboš Motl. My ignorance of this came up in a discussion on physics exchange, @Hunter comments on @user1504 answer http://physics.stackexchange.com/q/94981 and his previous inquiry in physics exchange have brought me to this point.

Clarify this difference. Can someone describe how it crops up in Quantum Yang-Mills? If perhaps one can engineer a simple physical theory that has such a transformation to describe its subtleties it would be great.

As usual I love really simple explanations as I am not any sort of expert.

I don't know if I pose the question correctly, but please feel free to edit it.

added 59 characters in body
Source Link
user39066
user39066
Loading
Source Link
user39066
user39066
Loading