Timeline for Truncated sums of symmetric polynomials; reference request for an algebraic derivation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 20, 2014 at 22:37 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | Thanks to all for the kind attention. Hopefully my next question will have more of a challenge. Gerhard "Really, I Didn't See That" Paseman, 2014.01.20 | |
Jan 20, 2014 at 22:33 | history | edited | Gerhard Paseman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 408 characters in body
|
Jan 20, 2014 at 22:13 | vote | accept | Gerhard Paseman | ||
Jan 20, 2014 at 1:21 | comment | added | Brendan McKay | I don't really get the question. The right side of your first display is just a rearrangement of $\exp(\sum_i \ln(1-x_i))$ after applying Taylor expansion to the exp and ln functions. When it is formally expanded out, all terms with total degree more than $k$ vanish, as they should by Taylor's theorem. | |
Jan 20, 2014 at 1:21 | answer | added | Aaron Meyerowitz | timeline score: 2 | |
Jan 20, 2014 at 1:04 | comment | added | Brendan McKay | Your first display has "[" once and "]" twice. Please fix it. | |
Jan 20, 2014 at 0:05 | comment | added | Will Jagy | Gerhard, unclear, do you have the two books you mention? I think I have both as pdfs. I found the second one already.. | |
Jan 19, 2014 at 23:16 | comment | added | Aaron Meyerowitz | DO you know that $k=m$ is not enough? | |
Jan 19, 2014 at 22:49 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | It occurs to me that this might be in a text like Enumerative Combinatorics or generatingfunctionality. If someone knows where this is treated, a text and section number would be appreciated. Gerhard "Lacks Good Web Search Terms" Paseman, 2014.01.19 | |
Jan 19, 2014 at 22:30 | history | asked | Gerhard Paseman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |