Skip to main content

Timeline for Hodge structure of abelian surfaces

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 13, 2014 at 12:26 comment added abx It is true -- it is just an elementary fact about cohomology of surfaces. There might be an isometry, but it is certainly not $p^*$.
Jan 13, 2014 at 11:47 comment added Li Yutong This is certainly not true - abelian variety and its dual are derived equivalent and hence when $G=K(L)$ we should have the isometry by Orlov & Mukai...
Jan 12, 2014 at 13:05 comment added abx $p^*$ is not an isometry unless $G$ is trivial. I suggest that you begin by a good book on the subject, for instance Barth et al.
Jan 12, 2014 at 10:25 history edited Li Yutong
edited tags
Jan 12, 2014 at 10:04 history edited Li Yutong CC BY-SA 3.0
added 341 characters in body
Jan 12, 2014 at 9:40 comment added Li Yutong (1)$\phi = p^*$ (2) $G$ may not be abelian (3) I don't know what is the role of the polarization in my problem, but that's the (only) information I know about the abelian surface.
Jan 12, 2014 at 6:54 comment added abx What you ask is not clear at all. Is $\phi=p^*$, where $p:A\rightarrow A/G$ is the quotient map? Is $G$ abelian? What is the role of the polarization in your question?
Jan 12, 2014 at 0:36 history asked Li Yutong CC BY-SA 3.0