Skip to main content
added 336 characters in body
Source Link
Jason Starr
  • 4.1k
  • 1
  • 93
  • 111

The boundary divisor $\Delta_0$ has intersection number $0$ with every $F$-curve of the form $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{0,4}$, yet has nonzero intersection number with every $F$-curve of the form $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{1,1}$.

Edit. Also, since $\lambda$ is the pullback of a divisor class from the Satake compactification of $\mathcal{A}_g$, also $\lambda$ has intersection number $0$ with every $F$-curve of the form $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{0,4}$, yet has nonzero intersection number with every $F$-curve of the form $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{1,1}$.

The boundary divisor $\Delta_0$ has intersection number $0$ with every $F$-curve of the form $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{0,4}$, yet has nonzero intersection number with every $F$-curve of the form $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{1,1}$.

The boundary divisor $\Delta_0$ has intersection number $0$ with every $F$-curve of the form $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{0,4}$, yet has nonzero intersection number with every $F$-curve of the form $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{1,1}$.

Edit. Also, since $\lambda$ is the pullback of a divisor class from the Satake compactification of $\mathcal{A}_g$, also $\lambda$ has intersection number $0$ with every $F$-curve of the form $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{0,4}$, yet has nonzero intersection number with every $F$-curve of the form $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{1,1}$.

Source Link
Jason Starr
  • 4.1k
  • 1
  • 93
  • 111

The boundary divisor $\Delta_0$ has intersection number $0$ with every $F$-curve of the form $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{0,4}$, yet has nonzero intersection number with every $F$-curve of the form $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{1,1}$.

Post Made Community Wiki by Jason Starr