Timeline for Which journals publish expository work?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2019 at 20:06 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 36 characters in body
|
| Oct 26, 2013 at 4:52 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Oct 26, 2013 at 5:03 | |||||
| Sep 12, 2011 at 2:08 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by S. Carnahan♦ | ||
| Feb 16, 2010 at 5:28 | comment | added | Philip Brooker | I really enjoyed the 'Irrationality via well-ordering' paper. However, on the Gazette web site the following message can be found: "Please note that following the AustMS Council meeting in September 2009, the Gazette will no longer accept technical, peer reviewed papers. Technical papers submitted before October 2009 will be processed as usual and undergo peer review". So, it seems that it is no longer possible to use the Australian Mathematical Society Gazette as a venue to publish such articles. Why this is so, I do not know. | |
| Feb 16, 2010 at 3:10 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | Yes, I'm Gerry Myerson. The papers were, Irrationality via well-ordering, 35 (2008) 121-125; Trifectas in geometric progression, 35 (2008) 189-194; and Crime investigation: an introduction to error-correcting codes, 36 (2009) 119-126. | |
| Feb 16, 2010 at 1:18 | comment | added | Noah Snyder | I think what's particularly bad netiquette is to post their names online as a guess. For example, several pseudonymous posters here have links to their homepages from their userpages. So figuring out who they are is certainly fine. But the reason they're pseudonymous is to control what comes up when you google their name. Hence what's bad netiquette is to actually type out their full name online. | |
| Feb 15, 2010 at 23:57 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | Comment removed. | |
| Feb 15, 2010 at 23:39 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | @fpqc, Leonid: I believe it's considered bad netiquette to try to guess the identities of pseudonymous users. (I made this mistake here once.) I do think it's also a little silly to be pseudonymous and make statements about your own work, but that's up to the user. | |
| Feb 15, 2010 at 23:18 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | Would you care to tell us who you are, so we might look these up? | |
| Feb 15, 2010 at 22:55 | history | answered | Gerry Myerson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |