Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:40 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
Jan 10, 2014 at 5:13 comment added wonderich @ Matthew, thanks, please feel free update as an answer if you also have some inputs. I need to do some extra work or you may rephrase it to help digesting it.
Jan 2, 2014 at 4:39 comment added Matthew Titsworth The reason that I ask is that below, Marcel uses Muger's result to provide a $G$-orbifold CFT whose representation category is the representation category of $D^\omega(G)$. However, the statement from which you draw your inital observation goes no further than saying that the two are Grothendieck equivalent.
Jan 2, 2014 at 4:22 comment added Matthew Titsworth What it seems like you mean by duality is that the representation categories of $D^\omega(\mathbb H_8)$ for some $\omega$ and $SU(2)/(\mathbb Z_2 \times \mathbb Z_2)$ are described by the same fusion ring. To clarify then, it seems like what you are asking is this: Given $G,H$ finite groups and $\omega\in H^3(H,U(1))$, is there a G-orbifold theory with fusion ring isomorphic to the fusion ring for $D^\omega (H)$ and if so, what is there relationship?
Jan 1, 2014 at 2:36 answer added Marcel Bischoff timeline score: 2
Dec 31, 2013 at 22:56 comment added wonderich See also this post Phy.SE on orbifolds of SU(2)/G' and SO(3)/G' if there are available data in the literature, please let me know. Many thanks!
Dec 31, 2013 at 22:54 comment added wonderich But are there some known examples appear between the twos? e.g. In my post I had provided one example. Examples are fine, it needs not to be very general. Physicists appreciate (many) examples more than a theorem. :)
Dec 31, 2013 at 22:50 comment added S. Carnahan The question of finding orbifold constructions of fusion rings is very natural and interesting. On the other hand, I don't see much evidence of a general duality here, since the rings are relatively small.
Dec 31, 2013 at 22:28 history asked wonderich CC BY-SA 3.0