Timeline for Why can't there be a general theory of nonlinear PDE?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2010 at 21:13 | comment | added | The Mathemagician | Leave it to Terry Tao to give the most knowledgable and succinct response to a deep question.His grasp of the Big Picture and relevant publications in any field never ceases to amaze me. | |
| Feb 15, 2010 at 4:26 | comment | added | Steve Huntsman | @Mariano: yes, as covered in your subsequent question: mathoverflow.net/questions/15309 | |
| Feb 15, 2010 at 2:20 | comment | added | Harald Hanche-Olsen | And even the completely integrable systems are full of surprises, such as the Camasso–Holm equation, where the solution concept needs some tweaking in order to make the Cauchy problem well posed. | |
| Feb 15, 2010 at 2:15 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | I wonder: can one not model Turing machines using ODEs? | |
| Feb 15, 2010 at 2:06 | history | answered | Terry Tao | CC BY-SA 2.5 |