Timeline for Integration on Compact Semirings
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2014 at 17:09 | answer | added | user46855 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 2, 2014 at 15:14 | comment | added | Joseph Van Name | J.E. Pin. I corrected that typo as well since I put x instead of f(x). | |
| Jan 2, 2014 at 15:12 | history | edited | Joseph Van Name | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Jan 2, 2014 at 10:08 | comment | added | J.-E. Pin | @joseph-van-name But then $f$ does not occur at all in the definition. | |
| Jan 1, 2014 at 23:58 | comment | added | Joseph Van Name | J.E. Pin. Thanks for pointing that out. That was simply a typo. I meant to write over $X$ for the $D$-partition. | |
| Jan 1, 2014 at 23:56 | history | edited | Joseph Van Name | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jan 1, 2014 at 10:02 | comment | added | J.-E. Pin | In 1. what do you mean by $D_1, ..., D_m$ refines $C_1, ..., C_n$? The $D$-partition is over $G$ and the $C$-one is over $X$. | |
| Dec 23, 2013 at 7:05 | comment | added | Joseph Van Name | Qiaochu Yuan. I was employing the bait-and-switch technique in the title of this question. If people at first think that this question is about functions whose domain is some compact semiring, they will associate this question with the familiar concept of the Haar measure. If they first think about functions whose codomain is a compact semiring, they will not associate my question with much of anything. | |
| Dec 23, 2013 at 5:44 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | Small nitpick: when I hear "on blah" I usually think of "blah" as the domain of the functions you want to integrate, not the codomain. | |
| Dec 23, 2013 at 1:49 | answer | added | Andrew Stout | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 22, 2013 at 22:58 | history | edited | Joseph Van Name |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 22, 2013 at 22:50 | history | asked | Joseph Van Name | CC BY-SA 3.0 |