Timeline for Number of disjoint simple closed geodesics
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 16, 2020 at 11:56 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | @BenoîtKloeckner perhaps my sensivity to the realm of real analytic objects comes from the book by Ilyashenko and the underlying subject study in that book 'A finitness theorem of limit cycles". This subject is discussed here at my MO question. mathoverflow.net/questions/171988/… | |
S Nov 8, 2014 at 20:01 | history | suggested | xyz abcd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
some typos fixed
|
Nov 8, 2014 at 19:56 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Nov 8, 2014 at 20:01 | |||||
Apr 2, 2014 at 20:22 | history | edited | Ali Taghavi |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 23, 2014 at 4:19 | vote | accept | Ali Taghavi | ||
Dec 23, 2013 at 7:56 | vote | accept | Ali Taghavi | ||
Dec 23, 2013 at 8:09 | |||||
Dec 21, 2013 at 19:59 | answer | added | Igor Rivin | timeline score: 4 | |
Dec 21, 2013 at 19:31 | answer | added | Anton Petrunin | timeline score: 5 | |
Dec 21, 2013 at 9:51 | comment | added | Benoît Kloeckner | Your first question seems interesting, although I usually do not like the real-analytic realm in differential geometry - here it makes sense. As for the geometric interpretation you ask, I don't quite see what non-trivial reformulation you are hopping for. Concerning your last question, $n=1$ is obviously feasible, and for larger $n$ a sphere of revolution with $n$ narrow necks should do the trick. | |
Dec 21, 2013 at 9:25 | history | edited | Ali Taghavi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 109 characters in body
|
Dec 21, 2013 at 9:14 | vote | accept | Ali Taghavi | ||
Dec 21, 2013 at 9:17 | |||||
Dec 21, 2013 at 9:12 | answer | added | Jairo Bochi | timeline score: 3 | |
Dec 21, 2013 at 8:55 | history | asked | Ali Taghavi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |