Timeline for Examples of toposes for analysts
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2013 at 21:04 | answer | added | Anton Fetisov | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 19, 2013 at 19:31 | answer | added | ex0du5 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 19, 2013 at 15:21 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | I wonder if there is any analyst who said, "Toposes are extremely important in modern mathematics." | |
| Dec 19, 2013 at 12:15 | answer | added | Bas Spitters | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 19, 2013 at 1:25 | answer | added | Anton Petrunin | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 18, 2013 at 22:04 | answer | added | Qiaochu Yuan | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 18, 2013 at 20:36 | answer | added | Qfwfq | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 18, 2013 at 19:42 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | The purpose was to help give readers some context. I suppose if the answers were only to be read by you my comment would be irrelevant. | |
| Dec 18, 2013 at 19:05 | comment | added | Tom LaGatta | @Ryan, do you have any examples of toposes which might be useful to analysts, or any reason why toposes are of no interest to analysts? If not, I don't see what your comment has to do with my question, since I don't see any comments indicating confusion among readers. | |
| Dec 18, 2013 at 17:32 | answer | added | Steven Landsburg | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 18, 2013 at 16:54 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| Dec 18, 2013 at 16:20 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | Not to take away anything from topos theory, but I think it's common practice for near every under-represented theory to portray itself as extremely important to modern mathematics. It's probably more neutral to just say certain specific people believe subject X is important to modern mathematics, and make citations. This could eliminate a lot of confusion among readers. | |
| Dec 18, 2013 at 16:04 | history | asked | Tom LaGatta | CC BY-SA 3.0 |