Timeline for A question on nested Hilbert scheme
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2014 at 19:55 | vote | accept | Jana | ||
| Dec 20, 2013 at 0:50 | answer | added | S. Carnahan♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 19, 2013 at 22:43 | comment | added | Jana | The question is edited. | |
| Dec 19, 2013 at 22:43 | history | edited | Jana | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 59 characters in body
|
| Dec 19, 2013 at 18:58 | history | edited | Jana | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Dec 19, 2013 at 3:21 | comment | added | Jana | @Yuan: Please feel free to edit the title with your preferred terminology. | |
| Dec 19, 2013 at 3:11 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | I mean, when I hear the word "relative" in this context I think that means that we typically have in mind a particular morphism. It seems strange to talk about a condition that refers only to the existence of some morphism instead. | |
| Dec 19, 2013 at 2:54 | comment | added | Jana | @Yuan: Could you elaborate a bit? | |
| Dec 19, 2013 at 2:41 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | For this construction to deserve the name "relative Hilbert scheme" I would think you'd want to fix $i$. | |
| S Dec 19, 2013 at 2:03 | history | suggested | R.P. |
retagged: hilbert-schemes instead of hilbert-spaces
|
|
| Dec 19, 2013 at 1:53 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 19, 2013 at 2:03 | |||||
| Dec 19, 2013 at 1:31 | history | edited | Jana | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Dec 18, 2013 at 21:42 | history | edited | Jana | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Dec 18, 2013 at 11:00 | history | edited | Jana | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Dec 18, 2013 at 10:03 | history | asked | Jana | CC BY-SA 3.0 |