Timeline for Structures that turn out to exhibit a symmetry even though their definition doesn't
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2018 at 14:08 | history | edited | Sam Hopkins | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 221 characters in body
|
| Aug 18, 2018 at 16:56 | comment | added | darij grinberg | I suspect that a bijective proof follows from Brice Huang, Cyclic Descents for General Skew Tableaux, arXiv:1808.04918v1, provided that this preprint is correct (always a risky bet with a bijective combinatorics preprint that has just been on the arXiv for 4 days). | |
| Aug 18, 2018 at 15:19 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | BTW, the proof given in EC2 is via (quasi-)symmetric function theory. I don't know if there is a bijective proof of this result. | |
| Aug 18, 2018 at 15:11 | history | edited | Sam Hopkins | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
split answer into two
|
| Mar 18, 2014 at 9:38 | history | edited | Philipp Lampe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
ne, cr and al should be the cardinalities of the corresponding sets instead of the sets themselves
|
| Dec 14, 2013 at 18:10 | history | edited | Sam Hopkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 320 characters in body
|
| Dec 13, 2013 at 23:08 | history | edited | Sam Hopkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added an example
|
| S Dec 13, 2013 at 23:01 | history | answered | Sam Hopkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 | |
| S Dec 13, 2013 at 23:01 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Sam Hopkins |