Timeline for Is there a good notion of morphism between orbifolds?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2020 at 1:38 | comment | added | Robbie Lyman | It's not hard to show that morphisms may be composed under this definition. The definition Satake is referring to in his footnote is different: in that definition a smooth map $f\colon M \to N$ is a collection of mappings from an atlas of charts for $M$ to charts for $N$ satisfying a compatibility condition | |
| Mar 9, 2017 at 8:52 | comment | added | Patrick I-Z | This definition makes smooth maps between orbifolds not composable, as underlined by Satake in his original paper in 1957, see the counter-example we gave below. | |
| Dec 14, 2013 at 9:52 | vote | accept | Bruno Martelli | ||
| Dec 14, 2013 at 9:47 | comment | added | Bruno Martelli | thank you for the reference! I accept this answer because the reference is closer to the definition I know, but I thank everybody for providing more "enlightening" definitions :-) | |
| Dec 13, 2013 at 20:58 | history | edited | Claudio Gorodski | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 471 characters in body
|
| Dec 13, 2013 at 17:36 | history | answered | Claudio Gorodski | CC BY-SA 3.0 |