Timeline for Parametrised Hilbert spaces; can we put a norm on the following space of Hilbert spaces?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 14 at 15:02 | comment | added | paul garrett | If you do have continuous maps among the $H(s)$'s that fit together well, as @TobiasDiez comments, you do have limits or colimits of the spaces. In fact, in the category of locally convex topological vector spaces, this does (uniquely...) characterized topologies on the (co)limits. | |
Jan 25, 2014 at 9:36 | vote | accept | weasd | ||
Dec 10, 2013 at 15:07 | answer | added | User4891 | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 10, 2013 at 14:14 | comment | added | weasd | @Tobias Yes that's (continuous maps between the $H(s)$) exactly what I have. I will have a look at the things you mentioned. Thanks. | |
Dec 10, 2013 at 13:54 | comment | added | Tobias Diez | In your problem, do you have an explicit dependence of $\Omega_s$ from $s$ which allows you to define a continuous map from $H(s)$ to $H(s')$ for every $s < s'$ or $s > s'$? In that case you might want to have a look at the inverse and direct limit construction of topological vector spaces. In this way you don't have a topology on $H$ but have nonetheless a limit space $\lim H(s)$. | |
Dec 10, 2013 at 13:33 | answer | added | Liviu Nicolaescu | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 10, 2013 at 12:17 | comment | added | Dan Petersen | Maybe mathoverflow.net/questions/101526 can help. | |
Dec 10, 2013 at 11:59 | review | First posts | |||
Dec 10, 2013 at 12:00 | |||||
Dec 10, 2013 at 11:57 | answer | added | Dirk | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 10, 2013 at 11:54 | history | edited | weasd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 87 characters in body
|
Dec 10, 2013 at 11:41 | history | asked | weasd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |