Timeline for What is the geometric meaning of integral closure?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Nov 17, 2017 at 7:22 | history | suggested | Zach Teitler | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Math formatting
|
| Nov 17, 2017 at 5:12 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 17, 2017 at 7:22 | |||||
| May 9, 2016 at 18:54 | comment | added | Alison Miller | @Ariyan Javapeykar -- thanks, you're right. See mathoverflow.net/questions/12688/nonsingular-normal-schemes for more details | |
| May 7, 2016 at 7:30 | comment | added | Ariyan Javanpeykar | @AlisonMiller I'm not sure whether that's correct. There are normal non-smooth curves over imperfect fields. Then again, the notions of normal and regular coincide on integral one-dimensional noetherian schemes. | |
| May 7, 2016 at 3:23 | history | edited | Alison Miller | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
(fixed statement of what normalization means)
|
| May 12, 2015 at 4:36 | comment | added | Alison Miller | Yes, that's right. | |
| May 5, 2015 at 9:15 | comment | added | Pavel Čoupek | Just to be clear, normal<=>smooth works for affine varieties over arbitrary field (not necessarily alg. closed), right? That is, coordinate rings of smooth affine curves are Dedekind domains regardless of the base field. Is that correct? | |
| Jun 26, 2014 at 1:59 | history | edited | Alison Miller | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Oct 20, 2009 at 23:13 | history | edited | Alison Miller | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 2423 characters in body; added 4 characters in body
|
| Oct 20, 2009 at 22:53 | vote | accept | Qiaochu Yuan | ||
| Oct 20, 2009 at 22:36 | history | answered | Alison Miller | CC BY-SA 2.5 |