Timeline for Have people successfully worked with the full ring of differential operators in characteristic p?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2022 at 4:32 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
http -> https (the question has been bumped anyway)
|
| Jan 13, 2012 at 13:17 | history | edited | Lars | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Feb 12, 2010 at 21:09 | comment | added | Emerton | Yes, sorry about this; I was copying the terminology of the earlier question that I linked to. I'm never sure what notation/terminology to use when discussing these various rings, since many non-arithmetic geometers don't know Berthelot's notation. | |
| Feb 12, 2010 at 14:27 | comment | added | Lars | Oh, good, then we are talking about the same thing. I was confused because you wrote "divided power differential operators", which are D^(0) in Berthelots language (and PD-Diff in the language of his older writings on crystalline cohomology), if I understand correctly. The higher D^(n) are constructed via "partially-divided powers". | |
| Feb 12, 2010 at 13:11 | comment | added | Emerton | By the full ring I mean Berthelot's ${\mathcal D}^{\infty}$, if I remember the notation correctly. Thank you for the references! | |
| Feb 12, 2010 at 12:56 | history | answered | Lars | CC BY-SA 2.5 |