Timeline for What's so special about transcendental numbers? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2014 at 9:37 | history | closed |
Lucia Chris Godsil Andreas Blass Joël Willie Wong |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Apr 2, 2014 at 19:17 | comment | added | Asaf Karagila♦ | Absolutely nothing is special about transcendental numbers. Algebraic numbers are special, though. Rational numbers even more so, natural numbers are particularly special, and $0$ and $1$ are the most special numbers of them all. Except $42$, which is special because it is the answer. | |
| Apr 2, 2014 at 18:42 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 3, 2014 at 9:37 | |||||
| Mar 13, 2012 at 13:07 | comment | added | Yaakov Baruch | not to be mean or anything... Diab is NOT a toddler... and is this really a suitable question for MO?? | |
| Mar 13, 2012 at 2:49 | answer | added | Abhishek Parab | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 2, 2009 at 18:29 | answer | added | Dan Piponi | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 2, 2009 at 5:31 | answer | added | Halfdan Faber | timeline score: 4 | |
| S Oct 21, 2009 at 6:58 | vote | accept | diab | ||
| Oct 21, 2009 at 6:58 | vote | accept | diab | ||
| S Oct 21, 2009 at 6:58 | |||||
| Oct 21, 2009 at 3:14 | answer | added | Jason E | timeline score: 10 | |
| Oct 21, 2009 at 0:48 | comment | added | Kim Morrison | I'm a grumpy old pedant, and I'll start closing questions with poor grammar if too many start appearing. I fixed this one ... | |
| Oct 21, 2009 at 0:47 | history | edited | Kim Morrison | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 3 characters in body; edited title
|
| Oct 20, 2009 at 22:50 | answer | added | engelbrekt | timeline score: 17 | |
| Oct 20, 2009 at 22:44 | answer | added | Peter Arndt | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 20, 2009 at 22:28 | answer | added | Michael Lugo | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 20, 2009 at 22:25 | history | asked | diab | CC BY-SA 2.5 |