Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

I am an undergrad and curious about the following question. Let $(Y,\xi)$ be a contact manifold, and $L\subset (Y,\xi)$ be a Legendrian knot which is the boundary of a convex surface $\Sigma$ embedded properly in Y.

Why is the dividing set on $\Sigma$ nonempty?

I know you can use Stokes' theorem to prove the statement for the closed case, but I don't see how it helps for the Legendrian boundary case.

HereHere is a related question, showing that the answer to the question above is trivial if ${\rm tb}(L)\neq 0$.

Thanks for your help!

I am an undergrad and curious about the following question. Let $(Y,\xi)$ be a contact manifold, and $L\subset (Y,\xi)$ be a Legendrian knot which is the boundary of a convex surface $\Sigma$ embedded properly in Y.

Why is the dividing set on $\Sigma$ nonempty?

I know you can use Stokes' theorem to prove the statement for the closed case, but I don't see how it helps for the Legendrian boundary case.

Here is a related question, showing that the answer to the question above is trivial if ${\rm tb}(L)\neq 0$.

Thanks for your help!

I am an undergrad and curious about the following question. Let $(Y,\xi)$ be a contact manifold, and $L\subset (Y,\xi)$ be a Legendrian knot which is the boundary of a convex surface $\Sigma$ embedded properly in Y.

Why is the dividing set on $\Sigma$ nonempty?

I know you can use Stokes' theorem to prove the statement for the closed case, but I don't see how it helps for the Legendrian boundary case.

Here is a related question, showing that the answer to the question above is trivial if ${\rm tb}(L)\neq 0$.

Thanks for your help!

added 23 characters in body
Source Link

I am an undergrad and curious about the following question. Let $(Y,\xi)$ be a contact manifold, and $L\subset (Y,\xi)$ be a Legendrian knot which is the boundary of a convex surface $\Sigma$ embedded properly in Y.

Why is the dividing set on $\Sigma$ nonempty?

I know you can use Stokes' theorem to prove the statement for the closed case, but I don't see how it helps for the Legendrian boundary case.

Here is a related question, showing that the answer to the question above is trivial if ${\rm tb}(L)\neq 0$.

Thanks for your help!

I am an undergrad and curious about the following question. Let $(Y,\xi)$ be a contact manifold, and $L\subset (Y,\xi)$ be a Legendrian knot which is the boundary of a convex surface $\Sigma$.

Why is the dividing set on $\Sigma$ nonempty?

I know you can use Stokes' theorem to prove the statement for the closed case, but I don't see how it helps for the Legendrian boundary case.

Here is a related question, showing that the answer to the question above is trivial if ${\rm tb}(L)\neq 0$.

Thanks for your help!

I am an undergrad and curious about the following question. Let $(Y,\xi)$ be a contact manifold, and $L\subset (Y,\xi)$ be a Legendrian knot which is the boundary of a convex surface $\Sigma$ embedded properly in Y.

Why is the dividing set on $\Sigma$ nonempty?

I know you can use Stokes' theorem to prove the statement for the closed case, but I don't see how it helps for the Legendrian boundary case.

Here is a related question, showing that the answer to the question above is trivial if ${\rm tb}(L)\neq 0$.

Thanks for your help!

Post Reopened by Daniel Moskovich, Andy Putman, Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine, Andrey Rekalo, Joseph O'Rourke
I've added some context, highlighted the question, and done a bit more of small editing.
Source Link

I am an undergrad and curious why dividing setabout the following question. Let $(Y,\xi)$ be a contact manifold, and $L\subset (Y,\xi)$ be a Legendrian knot which is the boundary of a convex surface $\Sigma$ is nonempty when it has a Legendrian boundary?.

Why is the dividing set on $\Sigma$ nonempty?

I know you can use StokesStokes' theorem to contrapositiveprove the statement for the closed case, but I don't see whyhow it helps for the Legendrian boundary case.

Here is a related question, showing that the answer to the question above is trivial if ${\rm tb}(L)\neq 0$.

Thanks for your help!

I am an undergrad and curious why dividing set of a convex surface $\Sigma$ is nonempty when it has a Legendrian boundary?

I know you can use Stokes theorem to contrapositive the statement for closed case but I don't see why for Legendrian boundary case.

Thanks for your help!

I am an undergrad and curious about the following question. Let $(Y,\xi)$ be a contact manifold, and $L\subset (Y,\xi)$ be a Legendrian knot which is the boundary of a convex surface $\Sigma$.

Why is the dividing set on $\Sigma$ nonempty?

I know you can use Stokes' theorem to prove the statement for the closed case, but I don't see how it helps for the Legendrian boundary case.

Here is a related question, showing that the answer to the question above is trivial if ${\rm tb}(L)\neq 0$.

Thanks for your help!

Post Closed as "Needs details or clarity" by Stefan Kohl, Chris Godsil, Daniel Moskovich, David White, Andy Putman
deleted 233 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 66 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 167 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 3 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading