Timeline for Conductor of a representation of a $p$-adic group
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2013 at 19:12 | comment | added | Paul Broussous | @Paul Garret. To make the story more precise ... In fact the mistake was pointed out to H. Jacquet by Nadir Matringe (University of Poitiers, France). The error was fixed independently by Jacquet and Matringe. Both published (at least submitted) their (different) proofs. | |
| Dec 6, 2013 at 18:16 | comment | added | schaffner | mirabolic * centre= parabolic he probably assumes something about the conductor of the central character. | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 3:59 | comment | added | Dr. Evil | The case of $\mathrm{GL}_2$ was first dealt with Casselman in his paper "On some results of Atkin and Lehner". However, it seems that he uses a different subgroup from Jacquet, Piatetski-Shapiro, Shalika [JP-SS]. Namely, Casselman uses the subgroup of $\mathrm{GL_2}(\mathcal{O})$ whose reduction modulo $t^n$ is the Borel subgroup, where as, [JP-SS] use the subgroup whose reduction modulo $t^n$ is the mirabolic subgroup. Can someone explain the discrepancy? | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 3:58 | vote | accept | Dr. Evil | ||
| Dec 3, 2013 at 0:41 | comment | added | paul garrett | Yes, but/and there was a correction, linked-to (top link) on Jacquet's homepage, at math.columbia.edu/~hj | |
| Dec 2, 2013 at 23:43 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 2, 2013 at 23:47 | |||||
| Dec 2, 2013 at 23:27 | history | answered | schaffner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |