Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 18, 2022 at 7:59 comment added Ali Taghavi Thank you again for your interesting answer. I am sorry I am not able to accept two answers simultaneously. BTW I am browsing your thesis"Method des orbit et representation quantiques"
Dec 1, 2013 at 18:17 comment added Ali Taghavi Tim,Daniel,Mike and Francois, thanks a lot for your helps
Dec 1, 2013 at 0:00 comment added Francois Ziegler @DanielPomerleano, Mike Usher: Thanks for setting me straight. I have now corrected my answer accordingly.
Nov 30, 2013 at 23:59 comment added Francois Ziegler @TimPerutz You're absolutely right :-)
Nov 30, 2013 at 23:58 history edited Francois Ziegler CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1511 characters in body
Nov 30, 2013 at 17:39 comment added Mike Usher Part 2 of the answer successfully shows that a certain specific diffeomorphism between the spaces is not a symplectomorphism...of course this is not the same as showing that they are not symplectomorphic.
Nov 30, 2013 at 16:45 comment added Daniel Pomerleano Check the other paper, that should make things clear. Also, I'm sure it's in Seidel's book on Picard Lefschetz theory. The fact you want is only stated within the proof of 6.11.
Nov 30, 2013 at 16:32 comment added Ali Taghavi Yes in my question I mean symplectomorphism. but how lema 6.11 implies that they are sympletctomrphism?
Nov 30, 2013 at 15:29 comment added Daniel Pomerleano I'm very confused: I think the answer to question 2 is "yes" if we mean "symplectomorphic". See e.g. Lemma 18.1 of Seidel's thesis or lemma 6.11 of arxiv.org/pdf/math/0006056v2.pdf.
Nov 30, 2013 at 15:14 comment added Tim Perutz For 1), there's no need to compute: $M$ is a complex submanifold of $\mathbb{C}^n$, hence a symplectic submanifold.
Nov 30, 2013 at 14:22 history edited Francois Ziegler CC BY-SA 3.0
make clear basis is chosen orthonormal
Nov 29, 2013 at 22:46 comment added Francois Ziegler Only perverts like us!
Nov 29, 2013 at 22:42 comment added Patrick I-Z Not many people use $\delta$ to denote tangent vectors...
Nov 29, 2013 at 20:45 history answered Francois Ziegler CC BY-SA 3.0