Timeline for Two definitions of Calabi-Yau manifolds
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2011 at 12:46 | answer | added | YangMills | timeline score: 12 | |
| Feb 14, 2010 at 14:19 | vote | accept | Evan Wright | ||
| Feb 11, 2010 at 23:25 | answer | added | Misha Verbitsky | timeline score: 25 | |
| Feb 11, 2010 at 23:22 | answer | added | Dmitri Panov | timeline score: 11 | |
| Feb 11, 2010 at 19:48 | answer | added | José Figueroa-O'Farrill | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 11, 2010 at 19:44 | comment | added | Evan Wright | If the first Betti number is zero, then topologically trivial automatically implies holomorphically trivial from the exponential sequence, but what about the general case? | |
| Feb 11, 2010 at 19:42 | comment | added | Evan Wright | After looking at it some more, we can get a flat connection on the canonical bundle just from the fact that it has real first Chern class zero and that it's a line bundle. Yau's proof implies that we that we can choose a metric on the tangent bundle so that the induced metric on the canonical bundle has flat Chern connection, but that doesn't seem to help in proving that the bundle is trivial. | |
| Feb 11, 2010 at 18:53 | answer | added | Chris Schommer-Pries | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 11, 2010 at 16:35 | history | asked | Evan Wright | CC BY-SA 2.5 |