Skip to main content
added 398 characters in body
Source Link
Windi
  • 833
  • 4
  • 8

I have been reading the online lecture notes by Fiona Murnaghan

http://www.math.toronto.edu/murnaghan/courses/mat1197/notes.pdf

The first lemma in p.35 says that every unitary representation of locally compact group $G$ is semisimple. In her notes, she defines a semisimple representation to be a representation which is a direct sum of irreducible representations.

On the other hand, people often say that the right regular representation of $G$ on $L^2(G)$, which is unitary, does not decompose into a direct sum of irreducible representations but it is a direct integral.

But if the above lemma by Murnaghan is correct, it seems that $L^2(G)$ must be a direct sum of irreducible representations.

I read the proof of the lemma in her note carefully, and noticed that even though she stated the lemma under the assumption that the group $G$ is $p$-adic and the representation is smooth, the proof goes through for any locally compact group and any uniterizable representation. Indeed, the proof only uses the property that any subrepresentation has the orthogonal complement and Zorn's lemma.

What am I missing?

I have been reading the online lecture notes by Fiona Murnaghan

http://www.math.toronto.edu/murnaghan/courses/mat1197/notes.pdf

The first lemma in p.35 says that every unitary representation of locally compact group $G$ is semisimple. In her notes, she defines a semisimple representation to be a representation which is a direct sum of irreducible representations.

On the other hand, people often say that the right regular representation of $G$ on $L^2(G)$, which is unitary, does not decompose into a direct sum of irreducible representations but it is a direct integral.

But if the above lemma by Murnaghan is correct, it seems that $L^2(G)$ must be a direct sum of irreducible representations.

What am I missing?

I have been reading the online lecture notes by Fiona Murnaghan

http://www.math.toronto.edu/murnaghan/courses/mat1197/notes.pdf

The first lemma in p.35 says that every unitary representation of locally compact group $G$ is semisimple. In her notes, she defines a semisimple representation to be a representation which is a direct sum of irreducible representations.

On the other hand, people often say that the right regular representation of $G$ on $L^2(G)$, which is unitary, does not decompose into a direct sum of irreducible representations but it is a direct integral.

But if the above lemma by Murnaghan is correct, it seems that $L^2(G)$ must be a direct sum of irreducible representations.

I read the proof of the lemma in her note carefully, and noticed that even though she stated the lemma under the assumption that the group $G$ is $p$-adic and the representation is smooth, the proof goes through for any locally compact group and any uniterizable representation. Indeed, the proof only uses the property that any subrepresentation has the orthogonal complement and Zorn's lemma.

What am I missing?

edited tags
Link
Jim Humphreys
  • 52.9k
  • 4
  • 120
  • 240
Source Link
Windi
  • 833
  • 4
  • 8

Is a unitary representation always semisimple?

I have been reading the online lecture notes by Fiona Murnaghan

http://www.math.toronto.edu/murnaghan/courses/mat1197/notes.pdf

The first lemma in p.35 says that every unitary representation of locally compact group $G$ is semisimple. In her notes, she defines a semisimple representation to be a representation which is a direct sum of irreducible representations.

On the other hand, people often say that the right regular representation of $G$ on $L^2(G)$, which is unitary, does not decompose into a direct sum of irreducible representations but it is a direct integral.

But if the above lemma by Murnaghan is correct, it seems that $L^2(G)$ must be a direct sum of irreducible representations.

What am I missing?